SimpleX vs Signal: Metadata-Resistant Messaging
Compare SimpleX and Signal for metadata protection. Learn which messaging app best prevents tracking of who you talk to and when.
Summary
SimpleX offers superior metadata resistance by using a unique protocol that doesn’t require user identifiers. Signal provides excellent encryption but requires phone numbers, creating metadata that can be collected. For maximum metadata protection, choose SimpleX. For proven encryption with good privacy, Signal remains excellent.
Why Metadata Matters
Even with encrypted messages, metadata reveals: - Who you communicate with - When you send messages - How often you message - Message length and timing patterns - Your social network
This metadata can be used for surveillance, profiling, and tracking.
Detailed Comparison
SimpleX Chat
Metadata Resistance: Maximum
Key Features: - No user identifiers (no phone numbers, emails, or usernames) - Decentralized architecture - No central servers that can log metadata - Double-ratchet encryption - Self-hosted server option
How It Works: - Uses temporary message queues instead of persistent user accounts - Messages routed through multiple servers - No single point of metadata collection - Each conversation uses unique addresses
Pros: - Best metadata resistance available - No phone number required - Decentralized architecture - Self-hosting possible - Strong encryption
Cons: - Newer, less battle-tested - Smaller user base - More complex setup - Less polished interface - Requires more technical knowledge
Signal
Metadata Resistance: Good (but not perfect)
Key Features: - Requires phone number (creates metadata) - Centralized servers (but minimal logging) - Strong encryption (Signal Protocol) - Minimal metadata collection - Proven security track record
How It Works: - Phone number used as identifier - Messages encrypted end-to-end - Signal servers see minimal metadata (phone numbers, registration dates) - No message content visible to servers
Pros: - Proven, audited security - Large user base - Easy to use - Excellent encryption - Regular security updates
Cons: - Requires phone number (metadata) - Centralized servers - Some metadata collection possible - Less metadata-resistant than SimpleX
Metadata Comparison
What Each Service Can See
SimpleX: - No user identifiers - No persistent accounts - Temporary message queues only - Cannot link messages to users
Signal: - Phone numbers (required) - Registration dates - Last seen timestamps (if enabled) - Cannot see message content
What Attackers Could Learn
SimpleX: - Very difficult to link messages to users - No central database of users - Metadata scattered across servers - Maximum resistance to surveillance
Signal: - Could link phone numbers to messages - Could see communication patterns - Could identify social networks - Good protection, but not perfect
Use Cases
Choose SimpleX If:
- Maximum metadata resistance is critical
- You’re in a high-surveillance environment
- You don’t want to use a phone number
- You’re comfortable with newer technology
- You need decentralized architecture
Choose Signal If:
- You want proven, audited security
- You need a large user base
- You prefer ease of use
- You’re okay with phone number requirement
- You want battle-tested encryption
Technical Details
SimpleX Protocol
SimpleX uses a unique protocol that: - Eliminates user identifiers - Uses temporary message queues - Routes through multiple servers - Prevents metadata correlation - Supports self-hosting
Signal Protocol
Signal uses the proven Signal Protocol that: - Provides forward secrecy - Uses double ratchet encryption - Supports key verification - Widely audited and trusted - Used by WhatsApp and others
Security Considerations
Encryption Strength
Both use strong encryption: - SimpleX: Double-ratchet (similar to Signal Protocol) - Signal: Signal Protocol (industry standard)
Metadata Protection
- SimpleX: Superior (no identifiers, decentralized)
- Signal: Good (minimal metadata, but phone numbers required)
Audit Status
- SimpleX: Newer, less audited
- Signal: Extensively audited and proven
Setup and Usage
SimpleX Setup
- Download SimpleX Chat app
- No registration needed
- Generate contact address
- Share address securely
- Start messaging
Signal Setup
- Download Signal app
- Register with phone number
- Verify phone number
- Add contacts
- Start messaging
Best Practices
For SimpleX:
- Share contact addresses securely
- Use self-hosted servers if possible
- Keep app updated
- Verify contacts when possible
- Understand the protocol
For Signal:
- Verify contact safety numbers
- Enable screen lock
- Use disappearing messages
- Keep app updated
- Be aware of metadata limitations
Common Questions
Q: Is SimpleX more private than Signal? A: For metadata resistance, yes. SimpleX doesn’t require identifiers. For encryption, both are excellent.
Q: Can Signal see my messages? A: No, Signal uses end-to-end encryption. They can see metadata (who you talk to, when) but not message content.
Q: Is SimpleX safe to use? A: Yes, but it’s newer and less battle-tested than Signal. The protocol is sound, but Signal has a longer security track record.
Q: Do I need a phone number for SimpleX? A: No, SimpleX doesn’t require any identifiers, including phone numbers.
Q: Which should I use? A: For maximum metadata resistance, use SimpleX. For proven security with good privacy, use Signal.
Conclusion
Both SimpleX and Signal are excellent privacy-focused messaging apps, but they excel in different areas. SimpleX offers superior metadata resistance through its unique protocol that eliminates user identifiers. Signal provides proven encryption with a large user base and excellent security track record.
For users who need maximum metadata protection and don’t mind newer technology, SimpleX is the better choice. For users who want proven security with ease of use, Signal remains an excellent option.
The choice depends on your threat model: if metadata resistance is critical, choose SimpleX. If you want proven security with good privacy, Signal is still excellent.